A single-judge bench disposed of a Writ Petition, holding that the prayer might not survive due to the efflux of time and remainders unserved without cause subsisting.
Petition disposed with liberty to revive by demonstrating that cause still subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
388 CWP-5230-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 P.P.SINGH THROUGH LRS. ... Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 10.09.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2026.09.10 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
P.P. SINGH THROUGH LRS.
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
AMAN CHAUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
