The court disposed of a writ petition for quashing suspension proceedings due to efflux of time and an existing interim order, reserving the case for revival if cause subsists.
Petition disposed of; liberty granted to revive by demonstrating cause still subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
387 CWP-5207-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 RAJBIR SINGH ... Petitioner
Versus
THE SAIDPURA COOP. CREDIT & SERVICE & ANR.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
| (AMAN | CHAUDHARY) | |
|---|---|---|
| 10.09.2026 | JUDGE | |
| ashok | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
ASHOK KUMAR 2026.09.10 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing of suspension proceedings survives after efflux of time in view of an interim order.
Rajbir Singh
The Saidpura Coop. Credit & Service & Anr.
Aman Chaudhary
Ashok
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
