In an oral order, the court held that the quashing petition had stopped subsisting due to the efflux of time and failure to serve notice. The petition was disposed of while reserving it to the petitioner to get revived if cause still exists.
Petition disposed of; liberty granted to revive by demonstrating cause still subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
780 CWP-4980-2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 SHAMSHER SINGH ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana. ********
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
| 10.09.2026 | (AMAN |
CHAUDHARY) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| ashok | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
ASHOK KUMAR 2026.09.10 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shamsher Singh
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
