Manoj Kumar Bansal HUF v. Union of India and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a writ petition challenging a Section 148 notice for lack of jurisdiction by relying on two recent decisions of a co-ordinate Bench that allowed similar petitions with liberty to the revenue to follow statutory procedure.
What the court decided
CWP-449-2025
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
125
CWP-449-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-13.01.2025
Manoj Kumar Bansal HUF
....Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Manpreet Singh Kanda, Advocate & Mr. Rohit Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Sr. Standing counsel with Ms. Muskan Gupta, Advocate for the respondent-Union of India.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court Bench can follow the decision of a co-ordinate Bench disposing of similar writ petitions regarding Section 148 notices.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj Kumar Bansal HUF
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Arun Palli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/449/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Arun Palli Sudeepti Sharma
- Order 2 — this page
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court