This court allowed a writ petition entitled to the same relief as granted in CWP-15791-2024 (Jyoti Sareen), quashing the notice dated 07.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and consequential proceedings.
Quashing of notice dated 07.03.2024 u/s 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and consequential proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-4056-2025 (O&M)
222
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-4056-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.09.2026
Aman Rai Dhamija
...Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Ambala and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
Present: Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocate for the petitioner. (through V.C.).
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms.Muskan Gupta, Advocate &
Ms. Tanya Kumar, Advocate for respondent(s)-revenue.
DEEPAK SIBAL, J.(Oral)
(DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(SUNISH BINDLISH) JUDGE
| 11.09.2026 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Harish Kumar | |||
| Whether speaking / | Yes | No | |
| reasoned: | |||
| Whether Reportable : | Yes | No |
HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.12 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-1-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether impugned notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 is liable to be quashed in light of previous judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jyoti Sareen vs. Union of India and othersFollowed¶15
CWP-15791-2024 Jyoti Sareen vs. Union of India and others
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aman Rai Dhamija
Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Ambala
Deepak Sibal
Sunish Bindlish
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
