During a RPI proceeding on non-supply of information, the Court accepted that the petitioner had been supplied with the sought data, finding no cause of action survived; the writ petition was accordingly closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
101
CWP-4020-2026 Date of Decision : March 27, 2026
DAVINDER SINGH
-PETITIONER
V/S
PUNJAB STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION AND OTHERS
-RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present: Ms. Shivangi Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Arihant Goyal, Advocate, with Mr. Saurav Saini, Advocate for the respondents No.3 and 4.
KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
3. Dasti also.
4. List on 09.03.2026 in the urgent list.”
and 4 has filed a written statement dated 22.03.2026, accompanied by
DEVINDER YADAV 2026.03.27 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
2
CWP-4020-2026
Annexures R-3/1 to R-3/5, which is taken on record. A copy of the written statement has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. Disposed of accordingly.
| March 27, | 2026 | (KU | LDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|---|
| devinder | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | : | Yes/No |
DEVINDER YADAV 2026.03.27 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Davinder Singh
Punjab State Information Commission
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
