Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared despite the case being called out twice on two dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
221 CWP-372-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.07.2026 CHANDERPAL ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AG, Haryana. ********
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 22.07.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.22 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CHANDERPAL
STATE OF HARYANA
OTHERS
AMAN CHAUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
