Allowed
Balraj Singh v. Union of India and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/3565/2025
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
130
CWP-3565-2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
Balraj Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
Present: Mr. Puneet Kansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Kavita, Advocate for the respondent(s)-Income Tax Department.
DEEPAK SIBAL, J (ORAL)
(DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDG E
(SUNISH BINDLISH) 10.09.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DINESH BANSAL 2026.09.12 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jyoti Sareen Vs. Union of India and othersFollowed¶1
CWP-15791-2024 – Jyoti Sareen Vs. Union of India and others
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balraj Singh
Union of India and others
DEEPAK SIBAL
SUNISH BINDLISH
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court