Disposed¶22

Vikram Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Jul 2026CWP/3370/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP-3370-2026 (O&M), High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decided 09.07.2026 by Jagmohan Bansal, J. Petitioners Vikram Singh and Others vs State of Haryana and Others. Compensation sought for land (90 Kanal 14 Marla and 32 Kanal 0 Marla, village Chulli Bagaria, Tehsil Adampur, District Hisar) utilized for Kheri branch Khabra Daroli Minor; representations of 21.03.2025, 11.05.2025 and reminder 19.09.2025 unanswered; reliance placed on CWP-7224-2012 (09.07.2013) and CWP-10063-2014 (22.05.2014). Petition disposed of with direction to respondent No.3 to decide representations in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.3 to address the petitioners' representations (Annexures P-1 to P-3) in accordance with law ¶22

Vikram Singh and Others Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

CWP-3370-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2026

¶4

Vikram Singh and Others

¶5

...Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Haryana and Others

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶10

Present:Mr. S.S. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶11

Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana.

¶12

¶13

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

¶14

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to decide their representations dated 21.03.2025 and 11.05.2025 (Annexure P-1 and P-3) followed by reminder dated 19.09.2025 (Annexure P-2) qua compensation for their land utilized for construction of Kheri branch Khabra Daroli Minor.

¶15

As per petition, petitioners are owners of land measuring 90 Kanal 14 Marla and 32 Kanal 0 Marla situated at village Chulli Bagaria, Tehsil Adampur, District Hisar. They claim that respondents took possession of their land nearly 43 years ago without any compensation in return. However, similarly situated landowners whose land was utilized for the same canal project during the same period (1981-1982) were granted relief by this Hon’ble Court in CWP-7224-2012 decided on 09.07.2013 and CWP-10063-2014 decided on 22.05.2014. They preferred

¶16

PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.07.10 13:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

CWP-3370-2026 (O&M)

¶18

-2-

¶19

representations dated 21.03.2025 and 11.05.2025 followed by a reminder dated 19.09.2025 but to no avail.

¶20

Learned State counsel submits that the Competent Authority would consider petitioners’ representations and pass an order in accordance with law.

¶21

Learned counsel representing the petitioners agrees to aforesaid arrangement.

¶22

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to address petitioners’ representations (Annexures P-1 to P-3) in accordance with law.

¶23

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶24

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE

¶25

09.07.2026

¶26

Prince Chawla

¶27

Whether Speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶28

PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.07.10 13:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Vikram Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

(O&M) Kartar Chand Vs State of Punjab

Amar Singh & Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

(O&M) Dharma Vs State of Haryana & Anothers

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority through Its Estate Officer Vs Ravinder Singh Kainth and Anr.

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority through Its Estate Officer Vs Jaspal Singh and Ors.

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs Kanwaljit Singh Brar and Others