Disposed
Baj Singh v. State of Pb. Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/3208/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Bench No.1 508 CWP-3208-2007 ASI Baj Singh…
What the court decided
AI extract
Bench No.1 508 CWP-3208-2007 ASI Baj Singh…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Daily Lok Adalat
Bench No.1
508 CWP-3208-2007
ASI Baj Singh VS State of Punjab and others
Present: Mr. K.G. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Thapar, Addl. A.G. Punjab. * * * *
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that following order was passed at the time of admission of this writ petition on 02.03.2007:
“Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the controversy in the instant writ petition is similar to the one arising in Civil Writ Petition No.8578 of 2000.
Admitted.
List along with Civil Writ Petition No.8578 of 2000. Notice regarding stay returnable for 28.05.2007.
In the meantime, the transfer of the petitioner from CID Intelligence Department shall remain stayed.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar writ petition
i.e. CWP-8578-2000, which was ordered to be listed alongwith the present writ petition, was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 06.02.2007 by filing an application bearing C.M. No.15089 of 2006. However, he further submits that he has no instructions from the petitioner whether he wants to pursue this writ petition or not in view of the aforesaid situation. Therefore, this writ petition be consigned to the record room with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same by filing an appropriate application, if need arises.
Accordingly, this matter is consigned to the record room, with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same by filing an appropriate application before this Forum, if the need arises.
A copy of this order be sent to the petitioner at the given address as well as to his counsel so that they could take appropriate steps for revival of the same.
(ARVIND KUMAR) MEMBER
RAJEEV THAKRAL 10.09.2026 2026.09.11 12:51 I attest to the accuracy andrajeev integrity of this document
ASI Baj Singh
State of Punjab
Arvind Kumar
Rajeev Thakral
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court