In this thin order, the Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' representation within six months.
Direction to respondents to decide the representation within 6 months after granting opportunity of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
119 CWP-29667-2026
Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS
... Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY.
Present: Mr. Aarush Neeraj Vaid, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ****
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2-
CWP-29667-2026
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) SEPTEMBER 11, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sunil Kumar and others
State of Haryana and others
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
