Dismissed¶¶15

Anubhav Khanna v. Central Information Commission and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Mar 2026CWP/2939/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty; withdrawal of writ petition; inquiry pending on complaint to Director of Income Tax (Investigation); petitioner Anubhav Khanna; respondents Central Information Commission and Others; CWP-2939-2026; High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Justice Kuldeep Tiwari; decision date March 17, 2026; Vakalatnama to be filed within 15 days; no substantive adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to avail appropriate remedy(ies) for not concluding inquiry on the complaint submitted to Director of Income Tax (Investigation); permission to file a validly executed Vakalatnama with the Registry within 15 days. ¶¶15

Anubhav Khanna Vs Central Information Commission and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

104 CWP-2939-2026 Date of Decision : March 17, 2026

ANUBHAV KHANNA

-PETITIONER

V/S

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND OTHERS

¶7

-RESPONDENTS

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

¶9

Present: Ms. Ritu Punj, Advocate, with

¶10

Mr. Sahaj Punj, Advocate, and Ms. Vijaya, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab.

¶12

¶13

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Ms. Ritu Punj, Advocate, records her appearance on behalf of the petitioner, under a memorandum of appearance instituted before this Court today, and as prayed for, she is permitted to file a validly executed Vakalatnama in her favour with the Registry within 15 days. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty to avail appropriate remedy(ies) for not concluding inquiry on the complaint submitted to Director of Income Tax (Investigation).

¶15

Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn , with liberty ( supra ).

¶16

March 17,	2026	(KU	LDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE
devinder
	Whether speaking/reasoned	:	Yes/No
	Whether Reportable	:	Yes/No

¶17

DEVINDER YADAV 2026.03.19 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Anubhav Khanna v. Central Information Commission and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anubhav Khanna v. Central Information Commission and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and Others Vs Nachhattar Singh and Others

Rehamdeen Alias Reham Din Vs Ld Appellate Tribunal Cum District Magistrate and Others

Rahimdeen Vs Assistant Labour Commissioner and Another

Dr Ruchika Singhmar Vs the Director General Health Services, and Another

Vinod Singla Vs Pesiding Officer Industrial Tribunal, Patiala