Bachna Ram v. State of Haryana and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
CWP-19913-2025 (O&M) [1] 250 IN THE HIGH…
CWP-19913-2025 (O&M) [1] 250 IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CM-1824-CWP-2026 in/and CWP-19913-2025 (O&M) [1]
250
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-1824-CWP-2026 in/and CWP-19913-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026
Bachna Ram
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
(VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE
(DIVYA SHARMA) JUDGE
10.09.2026
Pawan
Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
PAWAN KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Bachna Ram
State of Haryana
Vikas Bahl
Divya Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court