Suket Kumar Gupta v. State of Punjab and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, CWP-18765-2026 (O&M), decided 09.06.2026 by Neerja K. Kalson, J. Suket Kumar Gupta v. State of Punjab and others. Article 226 petition seeking a time-bound decision on a legal notice dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) and a representation dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) to respondent No.2, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Kapurthala, plus stoppage of alleged illegal construction by respondent No.3. Disposed of on the limited prayer: respondent No.2 directed to decide the representation in accordance with law within three weeks of receipt of certified copy; no merits adjudication. Advocates: Anshul Sharma for Nitin Mittoo (petitioner); Adhiraj Singh, AAG Punjab (respondent No.1-State); Dharminder Singh Randhawa (respondent No.2). No precedents cited; no monetary quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Respondent No.2 - the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Kapurthala - directed to look into the representation dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same in accordance with law within three weeks from receipt of the certified copy of the order; petition disposed of in those terms.