Disposed¶24

Ramesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Jan 2026CWP/1830/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors., CWP-1830-2021, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh (Kuldeep Tiwari, J.), decided January 29, 2026 — enforcement of award dated 28.10.2015; interest on delayed payment; Naraingarh Sugar Mills Ltd.; writ disposed of upon petitioners accepting offer of Rs. 1,00,000 per petitioner towards interest, payable within four months; no statutory provisions or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.5 to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- to each petitioner within four months towards interest on the delayed payment of the awarded amount. ¶24

Ramesh Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

239

¶3

CWP-1830-2021 Date of Decision : January 29, 2026

¶4

RAMESH KUMAR AND ORS. -PETITIONERS

¶5

V/S

¶6

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

¶7

-RESPONDENTS

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

¶9

Present: Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

¶11

Mr. Manmohan Saroop, Advocate, and Ms. Meenakshi Saroop, Advocate for the respondent No.5.

¶12

¶13

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Through the instant writ petition, the petitioners have sought issuance of a direction to the respondent(s) to release a sum of ₹10,00,000/in compliance with the order dated 28.10.2015 (Annexure P-4).

¶15

During the pendency of the writ petition, the amount of ₹10,00,000/- was paid to each petitioner. The grievance of the petitioners now survives only to the limited extent of non-payment of interest on the delayed payment.

¶16

A perusal of the affidavit dated 10.07.2024, sworn by Mr. Vinod Kumar Singh, Unit Head-II of M/s. Naraingarh Sugar Mills Ltd., reveals that the respondent No.5-M/s. Naraingarh Sugar Mills Ltd. has offered to pay an additional amount of ₹1,00,000/- to each petitioner, over and above the amount awarded vide order dated 28.10.2015 (Annexure P-4), towards interest. The relevant paragraph of the affidavit is reproduced

¶17

DEVINDER YADAV 2026.02.04 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-1830-2021

hereinbelow:-

“5. That thereafter Deponent, along with other officials of the Naraingarh Sugar Mills Ltd. having made efforts by holding meeting with workmen/petitioners in the premises of Naraingarh Sugar Mills Limited and offered an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- (One Lakh only) per workman over and above the amount awarded by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court which may be considered as interest and promised to pay the same by 31^st August, 2024.”

¶22

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits

¶23

that the petitioners are agreeable to accept the offer ( supra ) made by the respondent No.5.

¶24

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.5 to pay a sum of ₹1,00,000/- to each petitioner within a period of four months from today.

¶25

January 29, 2026	(KU	LDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE
devinder
Whether speaking/reasoned	:	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	:	Yes/No

¶26

DEVINDER YADAV 2026.02.04 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Ramesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seema Rani Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Amarjit Singh Vs the Presiding Officer and Another

Prem Wati Vs the Presiding Officer, Labour Court Bathinda, etc.

Anupam Vs Additional District Magistrate, Panchkula and Others

Amitsar Nagar Nigam Worker Union (Registeed) Amritsar Vs State of Punjab and Others

Jeewani Bai Vs Learned Appellate Tribunal and Others