HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
134
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-18228-2026
Date of decision : 10.09.2026
LASHMAN RAM ....Petitioner
Versus
SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER, CANAL COLONY FEROZEPUR, CANAL CIRCLE FEROZEPUR, FEROZEPUR
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Arshdeep, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous.
September 10, 2026 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Lashman Ram
Superintending Canal Officer
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
