Sansar Chand Rana v. State of Punjab and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition before the High Court, Chandigarh disposed of with no further orders after counsel for respondents No.3-5 submitted that Municipal Authorities had already initiated action against respondent No.6 Gurpreet Kaur for the alleged illegal construction raised over the property in question. Respondent-State appeared through Nirmaljit Singh Diwana, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab; respondents No.3-5 through Prem Kumar, Advocate. No statutes or precedents cited; no monetary quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for respondents No.3 to 5 that the Municipal Authorities have already initiated action against respondent No.6 (Gurpreet Kaur) regarding the alleged illegal construction, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition, which is accordingly disposed of.