A single judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to revive the proceedings if any cause survives, due to lack of instructions from the petitioner.
Liberty to the petitioners to revive the same, if any cause still survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
201-5
CWP-1428-2001 Date of decision: 11.09.2026
Kuldip Singh and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab & ors. .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present : Mr. Rahul Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3-Bank.
NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
11.09.2026 ( NAMIT KUMAR ) Vinay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
VINAY 2026.09.11 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Kuldip Singh and others
The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab
NAMIT KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
