Writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Counsel stated the petition had become infructuous, so the court dismissed it as infructuous and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
270
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-13833-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.03.2026
CHANDRA BHAN GULIANI AND ANR …. Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS …. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present : Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Sr. DAG Haryana for respondent No.1.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
(ALKA SARIN) JUDGE
17.03.2026
(RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE
Aman Jain
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2026.03.18 09:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Chandra Bhan Guliani and Anr
State of Haryana and Ors
Alka Sarin
Ramesh Chander Dimri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
