Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. Court granted the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
128
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12740-2026 Date of decision : 10.09.2026
RAJ SINGH @ RAJ SINGH DESWAL ....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. Kanish Jindal, Advocate and Mr. Kunal Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhimanyu Antil, DAG, Haryana.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant
writ petition at this stage.
September 10, 2026 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Singh @ Raj Singh Deswal
State of Haryana
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
