A writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal's refusal to summon voluminous records was dismissed, as the petitioner's application contained no pleading explaining the relevancy of the records sought; the pending industrial reference dates back to 2000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
119
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12590-2026
Date of Decision : 24.04.2026
SHISHUPAL VERMA
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATIALA AND ANOTHER .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present : Petitioner in-person.
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral)
(KULDEEP TIWARI) April 24, 2026 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No
DHARAM VIR 2026.04.29 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal erred in rejecting the petitioner's application for summoning voluminous records absent pleadings establishing their relevancy.
Shishupal Verma
Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patiala
Another
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
