Prem Singh Thakur v. State of Hry and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bench No.2. 505 CWP-1171-2006 (O&M) PREM…
What did the court decide?
Petition consigned to record; liberty to get it revived if desired.
Bench No.2. 505 CWP-1171-2006 (O&M) PREM…
Petition consigned to record; liberty to get it revived if desired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Daily Lok Adalat
Bench No.2.
505 CWP-1171-2006 (O&M)
PREM SINGH THAKUR & ORS VS STATE OF HRY AND ORS.
Present:None for the petitioners.
Mr. Jasvir Singh Saini, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.1.
None for respondent Nos.2 to 4.
Notice issued to petitioner Nos.1 to 5 and respondent Nos.2 to 4 received back unserved with the report that the office shifted to Panchkula. No other address of the petitioners is available on the file of this Court. In view of the same, the present petition is ordered to be consigned to record with liberty to petitioners to get it revived if, so desired.
(R.K.Nehru) President
10.09.2026
(Ram Chand Gupta) Member
joyti rani
JOYTI RANI 2026.09.11 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Prem Singh Thakur
State of Haryana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court