Civil writ petition withdrawn at the request of counsel; the Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to pursue remedies available in law, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and disposed of pending applications, if any.
Liberty granted to the petitioners to avail their remedies as available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
114
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-11404-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.04.2026
Sant Lal and Others
... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana and Others ... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present : Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
17.04.2026 ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) jk JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2026.04.18 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
Sant Lal
The State of Haryana
Alka Sarin
Ramesh Chander Dimri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
