Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner counsel's request, with consent of respondents; pending applications disposed of. No substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
112
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-11383-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.04.2026
Naresh Kumar ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present : Mr. Tarun Yadav, Advocate and
Mr. Parmod Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.3.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
CM-5389-CWP-2026
ANKUR GOYAL 2026.04.13 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CWP-11383-2025
-6-
CWP-11383-2025
the present writ petition.
no objection.
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
10.04.2026 ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) Ankur Goyal JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
ANKUR GOYAL 2026.04.13 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Naresh Kumar
State of Haryana
Alka Sarin
Ramesh Chander Dimri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
