Writ petition dismissed as infructuous because possession of the disputed property had already been taken by the Gram Panchayat. Petitioners granted liberty to revive the petition if anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
206
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1014-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.03.2026
SURJA RAM AND ANR …. Petitioners
VERSUS
COLLECTOR, HISAR AND ORS …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Manav Dhull, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Duhan, Advocate for respondent No.4.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
that the present writ petition has since been rendered infructuous as the possession has already been taken by respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat.
(ALKA SARIN)
JUDGE
(RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI)
25.03.2026
JUDGE
Aman Jain
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2026.03.27 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Surja Ram
Collector, Hisar
Alka Sarin
Ramesh Chander Dimri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
