Petition seeking mandatory directions for police protection against alleged threats from private respondents. Court noted pending representation and FIR registration, holding no further orders required at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (112) CRWP-9118-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026
Safia @ Safia Begum and anr.
...Petitioners
V/s
State of Punjab and ors.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kundra, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
The prayer in the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 BNSS (Section 482 Cr.P.C.) is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents No.2 to 4 to provide police protection to the petitioners and their family members from respondents No.5 to 51.
SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.11 17:05 I agree to specified portions of this document
September 10, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.11 17:05 I agree to specified portions of this document
Safia @ Safia Begum and anr.
State of Punjab and ors.
Jasjit Singh Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
