Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police to look into a representation regarding protection of life and liberty, disposing of the petition without expressing opinion on merits or validity of marriage.
Direction to SSP to depute senior officer to look into the matter and pass appropriate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRWP-6734 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-6734 of 2026
Date of decision: 09.06.2026
MEENU AND ANOTHER
……Petitioners
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS.
… Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT, JUDGE
Present: Mr. Amandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioners. (Through V.C.)
Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral)
General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
KAMAL GANDHI 2026.06.10 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-6734 of 2026
validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
(N.S. SHEKHAWAT) JUDGE
09.06.2026 Kamal Gandhi
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
KAMAL GANDHI 2026.06.10 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Meenu And Another
State Of Punjab And Others
N.S. Shekhawat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
