Pritik and Another v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Protection of life and liberty of runaway/married couple; writ of mandamus under Article 226; threat from private family members; direction to Superintendent of Police, Panchkula to act on representation dated 09.03.2026 (Annexure P-4); reliance on Asha v. State of Haryana (CWP No.6717 of 2009, 2012 SCC Online P&H 12746) and SOPs notified 17.02.2025 in compliance with Kajal v. State of Haryana (Crl. W.P. No.12562 of 2023); petition disposed of; oral order by Subhas Mehla, J.; Punjab and Haryana High Court; CRWP-2787-2026 (O&M); decision date 16.03.2026.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Police, Panchkula, District Panchkula, to consider and take necessary action on the representation dated 09.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law. ¶19