Petition under Articles 226/227 sought restoration of police security for petitioners claiming threat to life. State's reply stated reassessment found no need for security, though a PCR is deployed near the residence. Court found no further orders required at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
220
CRWP-1647-2026 Date of Decision:-12.03.2026
GURDEV SINGH @ GURDEV SINGH SANDHU & OTHERS
......PETITIONERS
VS.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Damanbir Singh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Ekampal Sagoo, AAG, Punjab.
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL )
-2-
CRWP-1647-2026
disposed of.
12.03.2026
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE
Kusum
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
KUSUM 2026.03.14 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to restore security cover to petitioner No.2 and her family members.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurdev Singh @ Gurdev Singh Sandhu & Others
State of Punjab and Others
Jasjit Singh Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
