Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Saroj Vs State of Punjab and Others — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

Home
Punjab & Haryana HC
2026
Saroj Vs State of Punjab and OthersSaroj v. State of Punjab and Others

Dismissed

Saroj v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Sept 2026CRWP/11185/2026

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

CRWP-11185-2026

-1-

145

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-11185-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2026

Saroj

….Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

….Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI

Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at Bar that at this stage, the petitioner will be contented if a direction is issued to the official respondents to decide representation Annexure P-1 of the petitioner within a time bound schedule.

Notice of motion to the official respondents only at this stage. 3. Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on their behalf and makes a statement at Bar that in view of the limited stand taken today in the Court, he does not intend to file response to the petition in question. He

VISHNU 2026.09.11 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

-2-

CRWP-11185-2026

also states that the representation Annexure P-1 of the petitioner shall be decided by the respondent No.2 in accordance with law within a period of 15 days from today.

In view thereof, nothing survives in the present petition. It as well as interim application/s, if any, stand/s disposed off.

[ RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ] 11.09.2026 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

VISHNU 2026.09.11 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Saroj
respondent
State of Punjab

Coram

AI extract

RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Punjab & Haryana HC
Decided on: 11 Sept 2026 · September
Registered: 11 Sept 2026
Case no.: CRWP/11185/2026
CNR: PHHC011557812026
Topic: Service and Employment
Disposal: DISPOSED OF

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

Saroj v. State of Punjab and Others, CRWP/11185/2026 (P&H), decided on 11 September 2026.

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI

Parties & counsel