Petitioners sought a writ of Mandamus for protection of life and liberty from private respondents. State counsel stated petitioners remain untraced. Court found no further orders required and disposed of the petition.
None granted. Court found no further orders required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-11081-2026 Date of decision :11.09.2026
ASHOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER
. .. Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Ritesh Grover, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL)
The prayer in the present petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hand of private respondents and further direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 not to allow respondent Nos.4 to 9 or anybody to interfere with the liberty and life of the pteitioners or to harass them in any manner.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE
11.09.2026 JITESH
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
JITESH LAL 2026.09.11 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of Mandamus should issue directing state respondents to protect petitioners' life and liberty from private respondents.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N/AReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ASHOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER
STATE OF PUNJAB
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
