Petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 seeking directions to police to protect his life/liberty. Court gave a direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation.
Direction to respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.09.2026 in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRWP-11076-2026
1
115
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-11076-2026
Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
MOHAN LAL
......... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present : Mr. Vaibhav Bhargav, Advocate, for Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral)
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-11076-2026
2
with law.
( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE
11.09.2026
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MOHAN LAL
STATE OF PUNJAB
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
