Dismissed¶22

Bohar Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC19 Jan 2026CRR/773/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: CRR-773-2023; criminal revision; Bohar Singh; acquittal dated 02.12.2022; Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Moga; complaint case CIS No. COMI 58, 2016; IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B; Legal Aid Counsel Jasdeep Singh Salooja (order dated 13.10.2025); original counsel Sukhmeet Singh; Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior DAG, Punjab; dismissed as withdrawn; petitioner wished to withdraw; attestation stamp VISHAL SHARMA dated 21.01.2026; no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

None; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner after the Legal Aid Counsel's statement was accepted at par. ¶22

Bohar Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

�� 

��

CRR-773-2023

�� !� "!"#

BOHAR SINGH

��

��

��

��$��%�&��$� ��'��(��' ��)��

¶10

*******�**

¶11

�� !��"#��!$��%!&��'�(!�� )*�"!$��+�,��$-

¶12

.��#��

¶13

Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior DAG, Punjab.

¶14

/////�

¶15

(��' ��)��+�� ,�-�./

¶16

The present petition had been filed challenging the judgment dated 02.12.2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Moga in complaint case CIS No. COMI 58, 2016 under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 wherein the respondent No.2accused had been acquitted.

¶17

Since Counsel for the petitioner was not appeared in the matter to advance argument and despite more than 02 years having elapsed, hence, Mr. Jasdeep Singh Salooja, Advocate had been appointed as a Legal Aid Counsel to assist this Court, vide order dated 13.10.2025.

¶18

VISHAL SHARMA 2026.01.21 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

��01120"!"2

¶20

��

¶21

On resumed hearing, the Legal Aid Counsel contends that the petitioner as well as the original Counsel engaged by the petitioner i.e. Mr. Sukhmeet Singh had contacted him telephonically and told him that they do not wish to contest the matter and intent to withdraw the same.

¶22

Since the legal Aid Counsel has already held a discussion and communication with the petitioner himself as well as the Counsel, hence, the statement is accepted at par. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶23

,(��' ��)��/� ��+�"!"#� �� �� 0#��#��!1��"2��!�� 3��2�� 0#��#��!4$�� 3��2��

¶24

VISHAL SHARMA 2026.01.21 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Bohar Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bohar Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M 3 Munjal Mobile Mart and Another Vs Nancy Traders

Prem Vati Vs State of Punjab and Another

Khurshid Vs State of Haryana and Others

Jagsir Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Satish Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Shyamji and Another Vs Ram Krishan and Another