Priyanka Kheterpal & Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise/memorandum of understanding dated 12.02.2025 (Annexure P-2), effected between the parties.

¶16

DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASE:-

¶17

FIR No.	Date	Section(s)	Police Station
312	27.06.2024	420, 467, 468, 471 and	Badshahpur,
		120-B of IPC	Gurugram

¶18

Vide order dated 20.02.2026, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise.

¶19

LAVISHA 2026.07.06 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh

¶20

CRM-M-9878-2026

¶21

2

¶22

Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Gurugram, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondent has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed.

¶23

The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. The relevant part of the said report is reproduced herebelow:-

¶24

Sr. No.	De	scription
1.	Total number of persons found involved as accused in the dispute/FIR	Two accused
2.	Number of complainant/victim(s)	One victim/complainant
3.	Whether all the accused and complainant / victims are party to compromise & signed the same	Yes
4.	In case, any affected person(accused or complainant) is left out or not arrayed as party in the quashing petition before High Court, detail whereas; Or His/her statement is till to be recorded, in compliance to the direction of this Court, details of suchperson	No complainant/accused has been left out in the petition and all have been arrayed as party in the petition.
5.	Whether any accused has been declared as a proclaimed offender/person or any such proceedings against him/her have been initiated orpending	No one has declared proclaimed offender. However, one case bearing FIR No.378 dated 21.09.2024 under sections 420, 406, 506, 120-B of IPC is registered at PS Kamala Marker, Central New Delhi,

¶25

LAVISHA 2026.07.06 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh

¶26

CRM-M-9878-2026

¶27

3

¶28

	adjudication	against petitioner – Priyanka Kheterpal.
6.	Report of the Court whether compromise is genuine, voluntary, and without any coercion or undue influence	Yes
7.	Any other aspect relevant to thepresent case.	Nothing worth noticing reported

¶29

Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and the private respondent is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.

¶30

In view of the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Gurugram, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 , the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed.

¶31

Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below

¶32

Petition stands disposed of.

¶33

06.07.2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) Lavisha JUDGE

¶34

Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/ NO Whether Reportable: YES/ NO

¶35

LAVISHA 2026.07.06 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh

Priyanka Kheterpal & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyanka Kheterpal & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rano Bai Vs State of Punjab and Others

Janga @ Jagga Singh Vs State of Haryana

Gurwinder Singh @ Gurwinder Kumar Alias Gokha Vs State of Punjab

Rohit Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Karuna Alias Kanishka Vs State of Haryana

Joginder Pal Singh @ Gulabi Vs State of Punjab