Ramesh Yadav Vs State of Haryana

“ Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, however, his name has been surfaced in the disclosure statement of co-accused namely Ashish from whom 205 boxes (2460 bottles) of country made liquor marka Shehnai were recovered. The said statement has no evidentiary value. The allegation against the petitioner is that the said vehicle from which recovery has been made belongs to the petitioner. He

¶19

JAWALA RAM 2026.04.18 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶20

CRM-M-9266-2026 - 2 -

¶21

further submits that co-accused Ashish has already been granted the concession of regular bail by the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hisar, vide order dated 05.02.2026. He further submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready to join the investigation.

¶22

Notice of motion.

¶23

Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, A.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.

¶24

Adjourned to 17.04.2026.

¶25

In the meanwhile, arrest of the petitioner shall remain stayed. He shall join the investigation and co-operate with the investigating agency and shall not leave country without prior permission of this Court.”

¶26

Continuing his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in compliance of the order dated 17.02.2026, passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation, and has fully co-operated. Therefore, he prays for confirmation of the said interim anticipatory bail order.

¶27

Learned State counsel on instructions, confirms the said averment made by counsel for the petitioner of joining the investigation by the petitioner, and submits that as of now, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation.

¶28

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶29

Since, petitioner has already joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is no more required; ad-interim bail order dated 17.02.2026, passed by this Court is hereby made absolute .

¶30

However, petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

¶31

JAWALA RAM 2026.04.18 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶32

CRM-M-9266-2026 - 3 -

¶33

Accordingly, petition stands disposed of , accordingly.

¶34

However, present order would be subject to the submission of passport of the petitioner to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses, within a period of one week from today. Otherwise, he would submit an affidavit, disclosing the fact that he does not possess any passport.

¶35

It is clarified that in case, aforesaid condition is not complied with, this order would be considered as non est automatically.

¶36

Pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶37

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE

¶38

April 17, 2026 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶39

JAWALA RAM 2026.04.18 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Ramesh Yadav v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Yadav v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Navjot Kaur and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sunny @ Sunny Kabariya Vs State of Punjab

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Arora Vs State of Punjab

Manoj Kumar Upadhyay Vs State of Haryana and Others

Nawab Singh Vs State of Haryana

Rahul Nagar Alias Rahul Alias Nannu Vs State of Haryana