Petitioners did not appear before the trial court to record statements, nor before this court despite the case being called twice. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
307 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8640-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 06.05.2026
SOURAV @ SOURAV BAJJAR AND OTHERS
.....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present: No n e for the petitioners. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Pu n jab. No n e for respondents No.2 and 3.
MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)
(MANDEEP PANNU) 06.05.2026 JUDGE
himanshu
Whether speakin g /reasoned Yes/No Whether reporta b le Yes/No
HIMANSHU 2026.05.06 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sourav @ Sourav Bajjar and Others
State of Punjab and Others
Mandeep Pannu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
