Sahil v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Document rejected for extraction: the supplied judgment text is almost entirely corrupted (mojibake/encoding damage). Court, case number, parties, advocates, statutes, cited precedents, issues, holdings, outcome and quantum could not be verified against any legible verbatim span, so all such fields were left empty rather than guessed. The only legible recurring text is the digital-certification line appearing at paragraphs 18, 23, 33 and 42: 'ITHLESH KUMAR 2026.02.05 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment'. The 2026.02.05 timestamp is an attestation stamp, not a stated decision date, and was therefore not recorded as decision_date. A fresh, correctly encoded copy of the judgment is required before this case can be indexed.