Satnam Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr.

What is this about?

Supplied text layer is severely corrupted (non-standard font encoding/mojibake); nearly all substantive paragraphs are illegible and fail verbatim verification. Only legible elements: a counsel line reading 'Mr. Vinay Malhotra, DAG, Punjab.' (para 11) and duplicate certification stamps reading 'LAVISHA 2026.01.15 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh' (paras 16 and 25). Court is recorded solely on the basis of the printed stamp 'PHHC, Chandigarh'. No parties, coram, case number, issues, statutes, precedents, holdings, amounts or disposition could be verified from the text as supplied; re-ingestion from a clean source is recommended.