In a petition seeking pre-arrest bail under Section 482 BNS, the Learned Single Judge allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition. The order remarks no specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(137)
CRM-M-51783-2026
Karan Kumar @ Kali Manchanda ……Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab
……Respondent(s)
Decided on : 11.09.2026 Date of uploading: 11.09.2026
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Ms. Arshdeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab (on advance copy).
Mr. Anmol Puri, Advocate for the complainant (Through V.C.) (on his own volition).
Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):
(SUMEET GOEL) September 11, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Karan Kumar @ Kali Manchanda
State of Punjab
Sumeet Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
