Partly allowed

Manish Bansal v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Sept 2026CRM-M/51778/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of bail cancellation order and issuance of non-bailable warrants. Court found petitioner's absence bona fide due to misunderstanding. Directed surrender within 15 days, payment of 20,000/- to PGIMER fund, and quashed B-Ws pending surrender.

What did the court decide?

Non-bailable warrants kept in abeyance; direct to surrender within 15 days; deposit 20,000/- to PGIMER fund; regular bail application to be decided on same day.

Manish Bansal Vs State of Haryana — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

¶1

136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M-51778-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.09.2026

¶3

MANISH BANSAL …Petitioner

¶4

V/S

¶5

STATE OF HARYANA …Respondent

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL

¶7

Present: Mr. Ketan Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Kshitij Bharati, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

¶9

¶10

SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral)

¶11

Vide this petition under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 13.03.2026 of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad in case bearing FIR No. 224 dated 05.09.2025 under Sections 318(4), 61(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Cyber Crime, NIT Faridabad. Vide impugned order, petitioner’s bail was cancelled, his bail/surety bonds were forfeited to the State and non-bailable warrants were issued against him.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had been regularly appearing before learned trial Court after his release on regular bail. However, he absented on 13.03.2026 on account of misunderstanding of date. On the same day, his bail was cancelled and bail bonds were forfeited to the State. He was ordered to be summoned by way of warrants of arrest. Learned counsel submits that petitioner had

¶13

AJAY GOSWAMI 2026.09.11 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶14

CRM-M-51778-2026 (O&M)

¶15

-2-

¶16

no intention to evade the trial and he was ready and willing to surrender before learned trial Court and face trial.

¶17

Order dated 13.03.2026 is perused.

¶18

Petitioner’s intention to join the trial appears to be genuine and bona fide. Therefore, without commenting on merits of the impugned order, petitioner is directed to surrender before learned trial Court within 15 days and move an application for regular bail which learned trial Court shall decide expeditiously, on the same day, subject to payment of costs of 20,000/- to be deposited in PGIMER Poor Patients Welfare₹ Funds, Chandigarh. Till then, non-bailable warrants issued against the petitioner, shall be kept in abeyance. Learned trial Court shall verify the payment receipt in the aforesaid fund.

¶19

Petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

¶20

Pending CRM(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶21

(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 11.09.2026 JUDGE

¶22

Ajay Goswami

¶23

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶24

AJAY GOSWAMI 2026.09.11 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Manish Bansal v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Bansal v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases