Oral order disposing of a petition for directions to police not to harass the petitioner via raids. Court directed Respondent No.2 to look into a prior representation.
Direction to Respondent No.2 to look into representation dated 24.08.2026
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
126
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.51755 of 2026 Date of Decision:- 11.09.2026
Sartaj Singh
…..Petitioner.
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present:Mr. Divyansh Vats, Advocate for
Mr. Harchand Singh Batth, Advocate for the petitioner.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J . (ORAL)
The prayer in the present petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’) is for the issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner and his family by conducting frequent raids at the house of the petitioner on the pretext of apprehending his father, who is involved in a criminal case.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) September 11, 2026 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
YAG DUTT 2026.09.11 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Sartaj Singh
State of Punjab
Vikram Aggarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
