Dinesh Sharma v. State of Punjab and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(129)
CRM-M-51480-2026 Dinesh Sharma ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and another ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 11.09.2026 Date of uploading: 11.09.2026
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Mudit Johar, Advocate for the petitioner (s). Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab (on advance copy). Mr. Manu Sachdeva, Advocate for respondent No.2 (on his own volition).
Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):
“It is, therefore, in the backgrounds of aforesaid facts and law it is, most respectfully prayed that:
a) The present petition may kindly be allowed and FIR No. 32 dated 16.03.2026 under sections 281, 106, 324(4) & 324(5) (corresponding section under IPC 279, 304-A, 427 & 427), registered at police station Ghall Khurd, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P-1) and all further proceedings arising out of the said FIR may kindly be quashed, on the basis of compromise deed dated 16.05.2026 (Annexure P-2).”
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.
CRM-M-51480-2026 -2-
(SUMEET GOEL) September 11, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.
Dinesh Sharma
State of Punjab
Sumeet Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court