Petitioner sought regular bail under Section 483 BNSS but withdrew the petition. Court allowed withdrawal and permitted re-filing after 3 months if trial progress is unsatisfactory.
Petitioner at liberty to re-visit either the Sessions Court or this Court via a separate petition if no substantial progress in trial after 3 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
229
CRM-M No.50753 of 2026 Date of decision : 11.9.2026 Date of uploading : 11.9.2026
Harsh Shrimal ………….Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
…….Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate and Mr. Manvir Singh Jaidka, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana
SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)
(SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE
11.9.2026
Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:
Yes/No Yes/No
Ashwanii
ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.09.11 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Harsh Shrimal
State of Haryana
Sumeet Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
