Petitioner filed a petition under Section 483 of BNSS seeking regular bail in an NDPS linked FIR. Counsel sought withdrawal of the petition. The court allowed the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
206 CRM-M-50194-2026
AMANDEEP
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB
.....RESPONDENT
DATE OF DECISION: 11.09.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 11.09.2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: - Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jaypreet Singh, DAG, Punjab.
SUMEET GOEL, J (ORAL)
Present 2nd petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.30 dated 29.03.2025 under Sections 21 of NDPS Act (Sections 25/29 of NDPS Act added later on), registered at Police Station Mallanwala, District Ferozepur.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand at this stage. Ordered accordingly.
11.09.2026 Jatin
(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
JATIN 2026.09.11 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant regular bail or order withdrawal of the petition during hearing.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
AMANDEEP
STATE OF PUNJAB
SUMEET GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
