Amit Kumar v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC13 May 2026CRM-M/4776/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted by High Court Chandigarh, Sumeet Goel J., May 13, 2026; petition allowed; release on bail/surety bonds before CJM/Duty Magistrate; seven bail conditions including deposit of passport with trial Court and disclosure of cell phone number to Investigating Officer/SHO; settlement between parties and rival contentions of counsel to be weighed during trial.

What did the court decide?

Release on regular bail upon furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, subject to seven enumerated conditions of bail. ¶¶30

Amit Kumar Vs State of Haryana — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Release on regular bail upon furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, subject to seven enumerated conditions of bail.

¶¶30

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to be released on regular bail. +1 more

¶¶30

Court's answer

The petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate.

¶¶30

Ratio / Principle

In addition to any conditions imposed by the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, the petitioner shall remain bound by enumerated conditions, including: not misusing the liberty granted; not tampering with any evidence, oral or documentary, during the trial; not absenting himself on any date before the trial; not committing any offence while on bail; depositing his passport, if any, with the trial Court; giving his cell phone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of the concerned Police Station and not changing it without prior permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate; and not in any manner trying to delay the trial.

¶¶31

Key takeaways

The rival contentions of the learned counsel for the parties, including the weightage required to be attached to the settlement stated to have been entered between the parties, shall be gone into during the course of the trial.ratio¶¶27

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court Chandigarh (Sumeet Goel, J.; decision dated May 13, 2026) allowed a petition seeking regular bail. The petitioner was ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, over and above any conditions that may be imposed by the CJM/Duty Magistrate, subject to seven conditions: (i) no misuse of liberty; (ii) no tampering with oral or documentary evidence during trial; (iii) no absence on any trial date; (iv) no commission of any offence while on bail; (v) deposit of passport, if any, with the trial Court; (vi) furnishing of cell phone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO and no change thereof without prior permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate; and (vii) no attempt to delay the trial. The Court recorded that the rival contentions of counsel, including the weightage to be attached to a settlement stated to have been entered into between the parties, would be gone into during the course of the trial. NOTE: substantial portions of the source text are illegible owing to character-encoding corruption; party names, case number, offences alleged, statutes and precedents could not be extracted and have been left blank rather than inferred.

¶1

�� 

¶2

��

¶3

�� !"�# $%&%!'(��)+�� !"�,-.!�#%'/(��)+��

¶4

�0%��1,0�2� �� � �%�%!' 2

��

3�� !"��24�'�

�� � &-!'# '��

��(��5�6��*��3��3��6�

��

�� !��"��

��#��$��#��

%%%%%�

3��67��*��6��

&�� '��()��+,�� -.-��$��$��'��'��$�/01�,��&**� ��.&�.2�-.-3��$��&)�(��4&��+�,��-.-�� 5�'��5��#��6�� 6��

¶15

-�� 7��$��#��/01��8�� /01�9��$��'��#��#��'��1�#��5�� 1�#��$��'�� 6��$�� 9��$��$��9��!��5��0��:�� ;�4�-.-3��<��#��$��#��'��24.&42*&;*� ��#�'��)(-;4;-432��=��$�<��$�� #��$��$�&.�*.>��7��

¶16

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.13 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

¶17

��

¶18

P a g e | 2

¶19

��#�'��#'��"��#��1�#�� 9��9��$��&.�� *.>��#��=�� $��"��=��$��1�#��$�� 9��/��#�'��#�� $��9��?��#��0 ��$�� #��'��#��#��#��9�� @A��$��+��0��@+0��7�� #��'��#��$��'��'�� $��#��5�#��9��9��#�� *3�..�...��7��/��B��C��$�� /01��#��'��$��$��

¶20

�� B��$��$�� .�&.�-.-3��B��$� ��$��9��#��$� ��/01��#��'��/01��#�� #��"��$��#��#��#�� '��'��9��7��$��'��

¶21

(�� B��9��$��'#��#� 9��.;�.*�-.-4��'�� $��$��$��$�� $��'�� B�� &-�3�-.-4��9��

¶22

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.13 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

¶23

��

¶24

P a g e | 3

¶25

(�&�� B��#��#�� #��$�'��'��9��

¶26

3�� 0��$�� $��'��

¶27

4�� 7��9��*.�&.�-.-3�9�� $��9��9��-4�&-�-.-3��7�� )��9��'��9��'�� A�#�� The rival contentions of the learned counsel for the parties; including the weightage required to be attached to the settlement stated to have been entered between the parties, shall be gone into during the course of the trial. ,��$��$�'��'��'��$��9�� '��$��#�� =��$�9��

¶28

�� $��4�#��&-��D��9��'�� /01��

¶29

�� 8��#��

¶30

;�� In view of the above, the petition is allowed . Petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate, the petitioner shall remain bound by the following conditions:-

¶31

(i) The petitioner shall not mis-use the liberty granted. (ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, oral or documentary, during the trial.

¶32

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.13 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

¶33

��

¶34

P a g e | 4

¶35

(iii) The petitioner shall not absent himself on any date before the trial.

¶36

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶37

(v) The petitioner shall deposit his passport, if any, with the trial Court.

¶38

(vi) The petitioner shall give his cell phone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and shall not change his cell-phone number without prior permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate.

¶39

(vii) The petitioner shall not in any manner try to delay the trial.

¶40

)�� 0��'�� 9��#��'��#��'��5E�� $��

¶41

��'��9��$�� #��'��'��#��'��

¶42

2�� :��$��

¶43

&.�� ,��$��'��'��A��

��#��

&&�� #��'��$�#��

��

(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE May 13, 2026 �� Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶48

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.13 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh

Amit Kumar v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Lal Dangi @ Jagga Vs State of Haryana

Dinesh Singh Vs State of Punjab

Vaish Education Society and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Another

Sahil Aadia Alias Sahil Nata Vs State of Punjab

Devrishi Gupta @ Dewarshi Vs State of Haryana