Narender Singh Dalal v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition withdrawn by the petitioner at counsel's request and dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
Petition withdrawn by the petitioner at counsel's request and dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.
Date of Decision: 29.01.2026
...Petitioner
Versus
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present:Ms. Inderpal Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that she does not want to pursue the present petition and the same is hereby
dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANDEEP PANNU) 29.01.2026 JUDGE Anu
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ANU 2026.01.30 14:24 I am the author of this document Chandigarh
Mandeep Pannu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court