The petitioner sought disposal of a case alleging the impugned order was a complaint made by the petitioner. The bench orally allowed the petition and disposed of the matter and pending applications without recording further reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-46452-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
HARBHAJAN SINGH
…PETITIONER
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
…RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present: Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG, Punjab.
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since FIR has been registered on complaint of the petitioner, the petition may be disposed of.
In view of submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition stands disposed of.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
11.09.2026
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
Sumit Singla
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
Yes/No
Yes/No
SUMIT SINGLA 2026.09.11 15:37 I agree to specified portions of this document
Harbajan Singh
State of Punjab
Shalini Singh Nagpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
