Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; petitioner unrepresented on consecutive dates and State counsel submitted the compromise was only partial, which is not permissible under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
161
CRM-M-46032-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-26.02.2026
Gurvinder Singh alias Harman alias Goldy alias Harshdeep
… Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Kumar Dogra, Add. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh and Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate.
SUBHAS MEHLA, J . (Oral)
( SUBHAS MEHLA ) 26.02.2026 JUDGE Geeta
Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
GEETA RANI 2026.02.27 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
Gurvinder Singh alias Harman alias Goldy alias Harshdeep
State of U.T. Chandigarh
Subhas Mehla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
