Petitioner, an accused in another NDPS case, sought to withdraw the present miscellaneous petition. Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of pending applications.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
215
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-44838-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
ARUN
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Ranwant Singh Sangha, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab.
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
As the petitioner is an accused in 01 other case under the NDPS
Act, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wishes to
withdraw the present petition at this stage.
disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE
September 11, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:Yes/No
VISHAL SETHI 2026.09.12 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
ARUN
STATE OF PUNJAB
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
