Petitioners sought to withdraw their petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
238+123
CRM-M-44175-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.05.2026
ANMOL SINGH @ ANMOL GILL AND OTHERS
….Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present: M r. Damanpreet Singh, Advocat e f o r the petitioners.
M r. Pawan Dogra, Addl. P.P., U T Chandigarh.
M s. Sanchita Jain, Advocate f o r respondent No.2.
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
L earned counsel for the petiti o ners seeks withdrawal of th e present petiti o n at this stage with liberty to fil e afresh with better particulars.
D ismissed as withdrawn at this s t age with aforesaid liberty.
P ending miscellaneous applica t ion(s), if any, is disposed o f
accordingly.
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 08.05.2026 JUDGE
Gurpreet
i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/ N o ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No
GURPREET 2026.05.11 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.
Anmol Singh @ Anmol Gill and Others
State of U.T Chandigarh
Respondent No.2
Rupinderjit Chahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
